.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

kim kardashian hairstyles curls

images kim kardashian hairstyles kim kardashian hairstyles curls. Kim Kardashian Hairstyles
  • Kim Kardashian Hairstyles



  • Desertfox
    12-10 07:06 PM
    Hi friends,
    I need your help!!!

    I'm here at California with L-2 visa. I can stay legally in US but i can not get a SSN number, i can work too.But For a driver license they ask for SSN. Do i still get the Driver License or no?


    Thank you very much...

    If you have valid L-2 status, you need to apply for your EAD (file I-765 with USCIS) to be able to work legally. Once your I-765 is approved, you will get your EAD card and you will have to take it to your local SSN office and apply for a SSN. Having your EAD (employment authorization) card allows you to apply for a SSN. Also no matter what, you will need a SSN to work legally.





    wallpaper Kim Kardashian Hairstyles kim kardashian hairstyles curls. kim kardashian hairstyles
  • kim kardashian hairstyles



  • StarSun
    02-07 12:47 PM
    IV calls for a couple of volunteers to collect the miles and purchase tickets to confirmed participants. Please contact me.





    kim kardashian hairstyles curls. kim kardashian hairstyles
  • kim kardashian hairstyles



  • sc3
    10-16 04:45 PM
    Read your above sentence, then read your below sentence. If I try to find a relation between these two sentences I do not know what you are talking.




    I think you know pretty well what I am talking about. USCIS has not "reacted" in any malicious way against the immigrant community wrt. to July 07 actions. If you find they have done so they will be severely answerable to various laws in the country. Do you think the lawyers will keep quite when they sense blood in the water? There has been no "reaction" by USCIS, except as a figment of imagination in the minds of this community.



    Again I am not sure what you are saying but MY PD is in early 2004 and RD was in Aug, they moved my application to another centre and my new RD is Oct. then I saw 2006 and 2007 cases getting approved. This is not right, why are they going by RD and not on PD?.


    USCIS has always gone by RD, not PD to a large extent (there have been deviations here and there, but none of them are due to policy issues). It is unfortunate that due to your application movement to another center you got a bad "RD" -- you should probably work with them to get the RD fixed.

    PD based processing is not sustainable as I had highlighted before. If you applied for 485 before someone else, you should be approved first. Now I am saying applied for 485, not Labor/Perm. Now dont come back with a post saying I applied July 2 00:01, but someone with July 3rd 23:55 is getting approved before I am. Afford some granularity of a week or so.


    Exactly dude, there should be some synchronization between DOL and USCIS. Just saying that USCIS is not responsible for DOL’s actions does not solve the problem, they can conveniently blame each other and take till eternity to process applications and you will keep saying the same thing that USCIS is not to be blamed.

    No, you did not say that, all you said was USCIS is not doing anything wrong.


    I did not say USCIS is "doodh ka dula", but DoL and USCIS are two different entities. You cant blame one for the problems of the other. USCIS has its share of blames, but to blame everything on USCIS just shows that you have lost your objectivity. You don't want to be blamed for the actions of your colleague, so why do you blame USCIS for things which are not their doing??


    If you keep blaming USCIS for everything (I am sure some of you want to blame the economic crisis, the Darfur issue etc. on USCIS too, come on!, you know you wanted to ;) ), the community's credibility comes into question.


    End of the day, you (and/or others) are distracting the OP's idea with FUD. If you have constructive ideas to channel OPs enthusiasm you should suggest alternatives. Not make her/him fearful with untenable accusations of retribution from USCIS.





    2011 kim kardashian hairstyles kim kardashian hairstyles curls. kim kardashian hairstyles
  • kim kardashian hairstyles



  • brad_sk2
    03-09 02:41 PM
    If your kids were born in the US then maybe they will be able to file for you by then and that will be definitely faster than EB-3. :D

    Hehe..nice one...and so true as well:(



    more...


    kim kardashian hairstyles curls. From Kim Kardashian#39;s demure
  • From Kim Kardashian#39;s demure



  • sanz
    03-11 11:38 PM
    is it really out
    Visa Bulletin (http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html)

    this doesnt tell that yet





    kim kardashian hairstyles curls. Kim Kardashian Hairstyles
  • Kim Kardashian Hairstyles



  • StarSun
    02-09 08:21 AM
    I have lived in VA before and know how much of a mess it can be to commute between VA and DC.

    However, for this specific event, would local members or those who have had experience attending advocacy days last year recommend to solely use public transport to get to the DC/Cap Hill area or would renting a car be of any help. I was thinking of just renting a car to just get from airport to place of stay and then use public transport on Mon/Tue to get to DC.
    LOOK FORWARD TO SUGGESTIONS as I need to plan my travel.

    Parking can be a problem near the Hill. It is probably best to use public transportation.



    more...


    kim kardashian hairstyles curls. No matter what her hairstyle
  • No matter what her hairstyle



  • nomi
    12-12 10:19 AM
    Nobody knows whether congressional action is needed to allow I-485 to be filed during retrogression?


    Look, No body know about it. I think we should contact with some law firm in order to find it out from some reliable sources.

    One more thing is what how does USCIS start retrogression. There is no law about it either. This is something USCIs start by it self using "New Rule" option.

    I think Core team should look into it. Since we spend so much energy to calling all Senators and we all know the results.

    USCIS can allow to file I-485 or they can make some rule without going congress.

    Correct me if I am wrong but there is some light in this path for us if we seriously fellow it.

    what do you guys think about it ??

    thx.





    2010 kim kardashian hairstyles kim kardashian hairstyles curls. kim kardashian hairstyles
  • kim kardashian hairstyles



  • diptam
    09-28 10:09 AM
    We have given some our most energetic and productive years of life in this country. We paid taxes,we spent money here,we got set with the way of life and peoples here.

    There is no question of running away. We got the skills,qualifications , attitude - we can settle anywhere we want - That's not an issue. Ther issue is that we should not run away from Problems. Otherwise where ever we go - we will have to moveout from there too in couple of years - who knows !!

    At the end of the day, its comes to ones preferences.

    The way i look at, after spending so many years in states, its just hard to pack and move. Over the period of time, we make friends, we have familes and above all we invest the best years of our lives.

    Pros and cons will be everywhere.
    India no doubt has changed a lot. One can debate about the pros and cons the whole day. I dont think money is a problem in india any more. The economy is growing like anything and will keep on growing. No doubt about it.

    I am sure folks who have spent 7-8 years in this country and are still trying to settle down, will love every oppurtunity to settle down here. Because this country is like our home now. We have given it everything. We have made sincere efforts in helping the American economy grow.

    Even if we move to other countries, there is no gurantee we will be treated good. We have to start from scratch, make friends, earn peoples respect and trust.

    Sometimes i feel sad when people talk about leaving the country, to whom they have given everything.

    I will like to ask everyone one question.
    Why not give one good shot at trying to fix the broken Employement-Based green card system? What are we all scared off? We never did anything wrong, so why do we need to leave the country?

    Folks think about it.

    I am sorry if i offended anyone, but this is what i feel.

    I believe in fixing things then running away from them. Thats my take.

    GO IV GO
    TOGETHER WE CAN



    more...


    kim kardashian hairstyles curls. Kim Kardashian Hairstyle
  • Kim Kardashian Hairstyle



  • prince_waiting
    09-27 11:27 AM
    Cultural barriers are not so insurmountable in the US as those in the EU.

    Even with the Blue Card can one work towards the naturalization process in order to become a citizen? In US you can surely do that after 5-6 years I guess.

    US gives citizenship by birth to our children if they are born on US soil, EU countries do not do that. Switzerland goes to the extent of invloving local communities before deciding an applicant's request. Please refer to http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6992670.stm

    However we can surely make lawmakers aware of the existing competition and argue to reform the EB immigration system.





    hair kim kardashian hairstyles kim kardashian hairstyles curls. Kim Kardashian hairstyles,Kim
  • Kim Kardashian hairstyles,Kim



  • gg_ny
    08-15 05:30 PM
    There is nothing shocking about it. This is how CIS works: move it slowly so that when the new numbers come in w.e.f. october, they can take it forward. EB2 India is where it was in the June bulletin. Thru oct 2007 it should move a few months as there was a big rush to file before Oct. 2005. In fact, Oct 2009 bulletin should be great because the retrogression started in oct 2005 and the applicants in the period between April 2004 - Sept 2005 should be covered (hopefully) in the fiscal year of Oct 2007 to Sept 2008. And a whole new year quota of numbers will be available for the first few months starting from Oct.2008 with not many takers and that could spill over to EB3 retrogressed.



    more...


    kim kardashian hairstyles curls. kim kardashian hairstyles
  • kim kardashian hairstyles



  • alex99
    10-25 11:19 AM
    Please participate in EB3 Poll





    hot From Kim Kardashian#39;s demure kim kardashian hairstyles curls. Kim Kardashian Hairstyles Up
  • Kim Kardashian Hairstyles Up



  • ashwin_27
    07-01 03:47 PM
    I think the new reference # for the Sanders Amendment is now
    Senate Amendment 4439 to the American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act (H.R. 5297).. Correct??

    People will be sending emails to senators with reference to the wrong amendment if this text is not corrected!!



    more...


    house Elegant Kim Kardashian Curly kim kardashian hairstyles curls. Kim Kardashian Braided Bun
  • Kim Kardashian Braided Bun



  • reachinus
    02-17 07:07 PM
    I have 16000 us airways miles in 2 accounts.





    tattoo Kim Kardashian Hairstyles kim kardashian hairstyles curls. kim kardashian hairstyles
  • kim kardashian hairstyles



  • bigboy007
    06-10 09:06 PM
    It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. Pandering to the client base will not help the clients, it will only help the service provider.
    rightly said. This is not first time this came up on radar. with success of TARP this comes up everytime we fix the system.



    more...


    pictures No matter what her hairstyle kim kardashian hairstyles curls. Kim Kardashian Hairstyles
  • Kim Kardashian Hairstyles



  • gnrajagopal
    07-28 01:23 PM
    Would you be offended if your picture is put on toilet seat??

    Are you ever offended by the sculptures that are engraved on the temple walls. women are potrayed in a very sensual way on these sculptures. i sometimes wonder that would have happened if those artists had the medium of vedio in those days? temples walls would have been.... well lets leave that to imagination





    dresses Kim Kardashian Hairstyles Up kim kardashian hairstyles curls. kim kardashian haircut long
  • kim kardashian haircut long



  • priderock
    01-22 05:31 PM
    I think thigns break even at some point. It is so frustrating that it becomes no longer attractive to pursue GC (If we have not already reached that point).
    You got to be open to change to survive, be it a person or a country. No point in predicting death before GC or any such extreme cases. It will definetely take as long as it needs. Its basic capitalism at best , supply and demand. You can't beat that.

    Nothing wrong in trying to change the course though.



    more...


    makeup Kim Kardashian Hairstyle kim kardashian hairstyles curls. Elegant Kim Kardashian Curly
  • Elegant Kim Kardashian Curly



  • pcs
    04-21 08:10 AM
    Keep calling people to get active & contribute





    girlfriend kim kardashian hairstyles kim kardashian hairstyles curls. Kim Kardashian hairstyle
  • Kim Kardashian hairstyle



  • paskal
    07-16 06:18 PM
    only the media can do this for us
    they like exposes' don't they?
    now how can we get them interested
    would the nyt reporter that wrote a story on Numbers USA be interested in a follwo up on their tactics?





    hairstyles kim kardashian hairstyles kim kardashian hairstyles curls. kim kardashian hairstyles
  • kim kardashian hairstyles



  • Hope_GC
    07-16 08:02 PM
    I agree with you..

    I've so many hard working American friends... it really make me want to work harder to compete with them, but these bunch of cry babies at Numbers are scared of skilled workers, they don't want to upgrade their skills, they want to work 9-5 and get paid for their incompetencies.





    abracadabra102
    08-29 04:54 PM
    "Reliable desi consulting company" is an oxymoron :D





    chmur
    09-11 03:04 PM
    EB3-ROW Pending per Aug 2009 I-485 Inventory ~ 63K
    The EB3-ROW Demand for October 2010 ~ 45K.
    So actually backlog reduction for EB3 ROW has just been 18 K (much less than the 30K they should get). I don't see where you are seeing the overflow.
    The total Pending in Aug 2009 was
    EB2 ALL- 75K. EB3 all -151K . So total ~ 225K
    The demand data today is EB2 = 34K(this is only I/C, no ROW demand)
    Demand for EB3 = 136K.
    So even though reduction in backlog is significant (225K- 170K =55K). It is not going to all categories evenly.

    And unless USCIS comes up with a smarter way to determine demand data other than counting pending I-485, once this demand goes to zero they will have to advance EB2 I/C dates. Now they can be smart and advance it by 6 months to not open up floodgates and test the post 2007 demand, or just follow the rule blindly that supply > demand and the category is current. Either way, the law prevents any spillover from a category unless it is current and EB2 I/C is not getting current in 2-3 years.

    I also want to believe like you that the hidden demand post 2007 for EB2I/C + EB3 ROW is as low as possible. And we won't know about the exact number till USCIS does a better job of reporting approved I-140 by country.

    Check with latest Inventory data - 05/2010

    Also - where can i get the demand data you are referring to ??



    Total Pageviews